Someone told me America was a place to express your ideas. But really we want to all be the same.
I was going to post something else today, but I read Cheryl Rainfield’s blog on Tuesday and it’s been eating at me. Her book, Scars, has been on my To Read list for a while because to be honest, there just aren’t that many books out there like it. It’s the story of a teenage girl, sexually abused and stalked, who finds control over her situation by cutting herself. Along the way, she falls in love with another girl. I’ve heard a lot of really good things about the book.
I can also see where it could be controversial.
There are a lot of viewpoints in the world today. You might be a right-wing loyalist, a tea party fanatic, or religiously adherent. I make no apology for being conservative in my views – but I also understand that you don’t believe the same things I do. And that’s okay.
Did you read that last thing?
It’s okay for people to believe differently. To want to read different things. Because we were all raised differently. We have different needs, wants, desires, fears and not all of our baggage is Gucci.
It upsets me that a public library would be pressured to remove a book by people who have probably never read it. Someone with too much time on their hands probably flipped it open, read the jacket and went screaming to another person. I’d like to know how many of those people asking for the book to be removed have read it, or are just judging it by the cover. I can understand high school libraries removing books that are of questionable content, but not a public library.
There’s a lot I could say about why Scars being removed from the public library upsets me. I could talk about my own traumatic times as a teenager. I could point out how a book like that might be the only therapy a teen could ever experience. But I can’t seem to put it in words. Maybe I’m too close to the topic at heart, so I apologize if I come off as a raving, drum beating crazy lady.
This is America. Where we’re supposed to have freedom of speech and press. We’re supposed to be the melting pot of the world. But we’re afraid of a book. An idea. Part of me wants to ask those requesting the ban, Why are you so insecure that a fictitious story captured in black and white text scares you? What happened to you that this threatens you so much?
When I wrote this up I asked myself all the necessary questions I wrote about in my Bad Blogging post, and then I started to listen to the slam poet, Bradly Hathaway. He has a piece about what it means to be ‘hardcore’ that says…
Somebody told me hardcore was a place to share what you believe, but I didn’t like what dude said, so I flipped him off and told him to leave.
That’s kind of how I feel like we’re acting. We see something, a book in this case, that we don’t like and it must be wrong, bad, or something else so we ban it, we speak out against it, and we seperate ourselves from what we say is ‘bad’ and in doing so we cut out bits and pieces of who we are. Ideas can be dangerous, they can create revolution, inspire love, or craft a beautiful letter. The written words on a page in the end only matter to you if you read them, and no one is forcing you to read them. You have to chose to. At least here in America you have that freedom.
I’m sad and upset that people can be so short-sighted.
Every year the American Library Association hosts a Banned Books Week in late September. They also keep tabs on what books are being banned, and how often. It’s a ways off, but I’d like to encourage you to scroll through the lists and see what books and authors are being banned. It might surprise you to see what’s on there.
Here’s a quick list from skimming the top ten books banned each year. These are books I am familiar with.
- To Kill A Mockingbird, by Harper Lee
- Twilight (series) by Stephenie Meyer
- The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain
- Harry Potter (series), by J.K. Rowling
- Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, by Mildred D. Taylor
To Kill A Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry are all books I read in school growing up. Are they at times uncomfortable to read because they introduce ideas of racism and violence? Yes, but those are part of our world. Twilight, I might not care for it, but I’ve never seen the books cause physical injury. The Harry Potter series breathed a huge breath of fresh air into Middle Grade and YA publishing. Yes, it’s dark at times, but what I’ve read of it there isn’t needless violence or a mandate to sacrifice your neighbors new born kittens in the margins.
Click through the list of banned books and the authors. Do you see an author you know? Are you surprised by it?
Posted on February 24, 2011, in Books and tagged banned books, Cheryl Rainfield, issues, Scars, soap box. Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.
LOVED THIS POST! <3
Most people look at the cover of the book and think all those things. That its bad and all that so they try to ban it. Like Harry Potter. People probably read magic? It has to be evil, demonic, and oh my god, kids are going to turn out satanists! But they don't understand, they don't know that the book is standing up for yourself. Friendship. Fighting evil. And LOVE.
When I was in college the books were banned from the campus. It was a small, private seminary university and from their stand point I can understand why they banned it, but I still read the first three books so I could make up my own mind. It’s just very close minded to bann books, especially from the general public. Obviously the person who wrote it believes in it, and if there’s one person there’s going to be more.
Another great post, Cid!
For books like To Kill a Mockingbird, I never understand the want/need to ban them due to racism. It’s a reflection on the times. People who read that book today are getting an insight into what life was like back then. It’s a reflection on the culture and society of the time. It shows us how far we’ve come from that.
If I were a parent, I think that I would focus more on the fact that my child wants to read period than focus on the material they’re reading. Granted, I’d monitor that a little though — not exactly going to be comfortable letting a small child read about mating barbs or anything (lol), but banning a book that was written for a young audience (Twilight or Harry Potter just seems silly in a lot of ways.
If society thinks Twilight should be banned because it’s “too sexual” for young adults, then society should stop over-sexifying (is that a word?) everything. We don’t ban TV shows like The Secret Life of the American Teenager or movies like Juno; both deal with teens and sex, so why would you ban a book with the same content?
…and just to clear my good name, Twilight should be banned for setting a bad example to girls and poor writing, but not necessarily for being “too sexy”.
Don’t worry Alice, there’s no doubt about how you feel about Twilight. I think parents should be involved with what their children are reading, and Scars doesn’t sound suitable for exceptionally young readers, but you can’t stick your head in the sand and let yourself believe that bad stuff doesn’t happen to teenagers and kids. Unfortunately it happens all too often.
I love to read. I’ll admit I mostly read things that some people might consider inappropriate but to see some of the classics I grew up reading was a shock. I never knew Of Mice and Men was banned. You opened my eyes. Thank you. I’ll be heading over to see if my library has Scars & pick it up if they do.
I know! I looked through the list last year during Banned Books Week and was shocked. I was reading Richelle Mead at the time, who is on their list for authors banned most often, and was disgruntled about it. Of Mice and Men seems to hit the top ten list about every other year. When I was in high school it was one of the main pieces people used in UIL Prose reading competitions.
In 8th grade there was an incident with a teacher. The teacher was a person that I loathed. She had a tendency to favor females over males, had pets in her class that she doted on, and generally didn’t like me or my family at all. (Since I was the youngest, I inherited the animosity that she had towards my mom from when my brother went through her class.) I had to take her for a certain portion of my schooling – I went to a small rural school and she was one of the Jr. High teachers.
One day she decided to have us do a paper on “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. (The book is a wonderful read, one I still treasure. It is a great and sad tale…) We read through the book on our on and in class. Now remember: we were a bunch of 8th graders. The boys talked about some pretty risque topics all the time (Mostly about girls) and we tended to have foul mouths…away from our parents, of course. There is a point in the book where the main character first experiences a certain event – he talks about how he wakes up and his sheets are wet and messy.
This was nothing new to *any* of the males in my class. I am also sure that the females had at least heard us talk about it on occasion. However, being a smart ass, I decided to tell my close friend that we could use this to get this particular teacher fired. I said that as a joke, in no way intending to actually act on it.
However my friend took the book home and showed it to his grandparents, who were raising him. They took the book to the school board and the school board hauled this teacher in front of it. The females in the class put together a defense but the males, including me, did not.
In the end the teacher did not get fired but she had to show all books that she used in the curriculum to the principle before reading them and had to make a public apology.
I felt like I should’ve stood up for her, well mainly I should’ve stood up for the book and I did..among my friends. It is an great read and that particular passage didn’t have anything in it that we hadn’t heard before. This was the late 80s, we heard worse going to the movies or talking with our older siblings. It always amazed me how one sentence out of one book could get people angry enough to punish someone for something they didn’t do wrong.
This blog post reminded me of this experience in my life – one that helped mold my mind against banning books. We live in a country where pandora’s box is already open and we can’t put that back in. Banning a certain tome won’t help but talking about said books will. In my school if the parents had talked about what the book actually stood for, a tale of person gaining then loosing life, it may have turned out better. Unfortunately people on both sides of the aisle, consertative and liberal, seem to jump to conclusions really fast. Just like my situation, there often is more going on then a real concern for the people involved.
Oh, Flowers for Algernon! Very beautiful and very sad. I read that too, probably in the late 90′s, but I don’t think we were allowed to read the full text and when we were allowed to watch the movie the teacher had to fast forward through parts of it. It’s crazy how things can get blown out of porportion or misunderstood. And small schools are tough, I went from a school of several thousand to just a few hundred. Oh the differences!
Pingback: Weekly Check-In « Cid Tyer